OpenAI said Thursday that it is upgrading its popular ChatGPT chatbot to allow users to customize its behavior to address concerns about bot bias.
The San Francisco, California-based startup said it works to mitigate political and other biases, but also wants to take into account the more diverse viewpoints that Microsoft has funded and used to drive its latest technology.
(Open AI) said in a blog post that it believes that artificial intelligence should be a useful tool for individuals, allowing each user to personalize their experience within the limits set by society, so "us". ChatGPT bot". To allow users to easily customize its behavior.
The company explained that allowing user personalization (GBT chat) would allow an output that others might strongly object to. Striking the right balance here is difficult, she added, "because over-personalisation risks opening the door to malicious applications of our technology and persuading AIs that thoughtlessly amplify people's existing beliefs."
Launched last November, ChatGBT has generated lively interest in the underlying technology known as generative AI, which is used to generate responses that mimic human speech.
The bot has amazed people all over the world with its ability to create articles, poems, stories, code, and more.
(OpenAI) comes after responses from a new search engine (Bing) based on an updated version of the chatbot (GBT) sparked a wave of criticism, with many warning that the technology is not yet ready for the public due to its risks. Here is Microsoft's answer yesterday.
OpenAI said in its article that ChatGPT responses were initially trained on large text datasets available on the Internet. In the second step, the human looks at smaller data sets and asks the robot to follow them in different situations.
For example, if a user requests adult, violent, or hateful content, reviewers should ask ChatGBT to respond with something like, "I can't reply." When reviewers are asked about a controversial topic, they should allow ChatGBT to answer the question but provide a different point of view, rather than trying to present one as being valid on a topic.